Researchers prove smaller is better to improve efficiency of chemical catalysts
Being the right size and existing in the limbo between a solid and a liquid state appear to be the secrets to improving the efficiency of chemical catalysts that can create better nanoparticles or more efficient energy sources.
When matter is in this transitional state, a catalyst can achieve its utmost potential with the right combination of catalyst particle size and temperature, according to a pair of Duke University researchers. A catalyst is an agent or chemical that facilitates a chemical reaction. It is estimated that more than 90 percent of chemical processes used by industry involve catalysts at some point.
This finding could have broad implications in almost every catalyst-based reaction, according to an engineer and a chemist at Duke who reported their findings on line in the American Chemical Society’s journal ACS-NANO. The team found that the surface-to-volume ratio of the catalyst particle – its size -- is more important than generally appreciated.
“We found that the smaller size of a catalyst will lead to a faster reaction than if the bulk, or larger, version of the same catalyst is used," said Stefano Curtarolo, associate professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Sciences.
"This is in addition to the usual excess of surface in the nanoparticles,” said Curtarolo, who came up with the theoretical basis of the findings three years ago and saw them confirmed by a series of intricate experiments conducted by Jie Liu, Duke professor of chemistry.
“This opens up a whole new area of study, since the thermo-kinetic state of the catalyst has not before been considered an important factor,” Curtarolo said. “It is on the face of it paradoxical. It’s like saying if a car uses less gas (a smaller particle), it will go faster and further.”
Their series of experiments were conducted using carbon nanotubes, and the scientists believe that same principles they described in the paper apply to all catalyst-driven processes.
Liu proved Curtarolo’s hypothesis by developing a novel method for measuring not only the lengths of growing carbon nanotubes, but also their diameters. Nanotubes are microscopic “mesh-like” tubular structures that are used in hundreds of products, such as textiles, solar cells, transistors, pollution filters and body armor.
“Normally, nanotubes grow from a flat surface in an unorganized manner and look like a plate of spaghetti, so it is impossible to measure any individual tube,” Liu said. “We were able to grow them in individual parallel strands, which permitted us to measure the rate of growth as well as the length of growth.”
By growing these nanotubes using different catalyst particle sizes and at different temperatures, Liu was able to determine the “sweet spot” at which the nanotubes grew the fastest and longest. As it turned out, this happened when the particle was in its viscous state, and that smaller was better than larger, exactly as predicted before.
These measurements provided the experimental underpinning of Curtarolo’s hypothesis that given a particular temperature, smaller nanoparticles are more effective and efficient per unit area than larger catalysts of the same type when they reside in that dimension between solid and liquid.
“Typically, in this field the experimental results come first, and the explanation comes later,” Liu said. “In this case, which is unusual, we took the hypothesis and were able to develop a method to prove it correct in the laboratory.”
The research was supported by the Office of Naval Research, the National Science Foundation, the Department of Energy and the National Council of Science and Technology (CONACYT), Mexico. Duke’s Thomas McNicholas and Jay Simmons, as well as Felipe Cervantes-Sodi, Gabor Csanyi and Andrea Ferrari, University of Cambridge, U.K., were also members of the team.
Source: Duke University /...
The Institute of Nanotechnology puts significant effort into ensuring that the information provided on its news pages is accurate and up-to-date. However, we cannot guarantee absolute accuracy. Consequently, the Institute of Nanotechnology disclaims any and all responsibility for inaccuracy, omission or any kind of deficiency in relation to the news items and articles hosted herein.
- 22 July 2014Supporting Recommendations for Future Topics in Horizon 2020
- 17 June 20142014 edition of European NanoSafety Cluster Compendium now online
- 14 May 2014Gold nanoparticles for cancer treatment
- 22 April 2014Irish Materials Research Centre (AMBER) in World First Graphene Innovation
- 15 April 2014Targeting cancer with a triple threat
- View All