PAPER TITLE: AUTHOR: Prof. Ken Donaldson, University of Edinburgh
ABSTRACT: There is clear and present
need for short-term testing of hazard in order to gain information towards
risk assessment of nanoparticles. However, the large number of nanoparticles
and their variants, different sizes and coatings for instance, that require
testing and ethical pressure towards non-animal testing means that expensive
animal bioassay is precluded. The only rational way to achieve a situation
where we do not need to test every single NP and its variants in toxicology
tests is to relate the physicochemical characteristics of NP with their
toxicity in a SAR (Structure Activity Relationship) model. If such a model
were to be developed then, ideally, an untested particle could have its
toxicity predicted on the basis of its physico-chemistry. There is sufficient
knowledge from particle toxicology to allow rational choice of assays
on which to base first attempts towards relating particle structure to
toxic activities that are important for disease, especially ability to
cause inflammation. In the University of Edinburgh we are carrying out
two such studies, attempting to relate nanoparticle structure to biological
activity :- 1) In a Colt Foundation-funded study using 13 metal oxide
nanoparticles with free radical generation and oxidative stress as the
structures and inflammation as the activity ; 2) In a NERC–funded
pilot study using a panel of 20 nanoparticles with varying structures
and simple measures of cellular toxicity and oxidative tress as the activities.
|
|
Close window |
|